Do we sometimes think many thoughts without external stimulation? Could all this be explained by the follow-up concept of desire? The word ‘desire’ can be an empty word put in like a magic word when the cause place for the things we do is empty. ‘Why did we do it? I felt the desire to do it.’ This meant that it could be self-repeating.
Humanity thinks that causal processes are natural. When something is preceded by time, it is the cause and what is followed are referred to as the consequences. But it can also be an imaginary representation of the temporal flow. It was not that the direction of time was set and the cause that preceded it and the cause that followed it were called the consequences, but that he was setting the order between this and this and felt in reverse that the direction was the flow of time. Paradoxically, time does not feel alone. Time is a concept that can only be said if it is accompanied by change. It is difficult to prove that time has passed even when there is no change. It is a separate interpretation of time and events, a concept that cannot be separated from each other as long as we think of time as only being felt through the sequence of events. Rather, it is a concept in which time is dependent on the sequence of events.
Some say irreversible actions are the only thing that determines the passage of time. But it could also be because it was only naturally observed in one of the unidirectional directions, and did not want to feel in the opposite direction. Irreversible behavior is an expression of asymmetry, not the right direction. We are only naturally feeling one of them.
In that sense, our causal thinking base is an arbitrary act. In other words, it is a thought direction that travels in an irreversible direction. It would be quick to understand that this was also a self-saccharidic word.
But more importantly, even this logical unfolding process is unfolding based on the causal direction. What does it mean to conclude that causal flows are arbitrary based on causal flows?