What is death to intelligence?

Thinking about how we have intelligence, we very well bring up the principle of natural selection. It is logical that only intelligent beings survived because intelligence helped them survive. On the contrary, beings lacking intelligence were closer to death. But did he?

Intelligence would have been helpful up to a point. Being aware of the risks and being able to come up with a solution to avoid them would have been directly helpful. If so, how has intelligent development been since then? In other words, the principle of natural selection is explained as a threshold, but it does not explain the ability of intelligence to grow. Some might say that: The rapidly acquiring intelligence was able to quickly surpass the most vulnerable infancy from danger. With this logic, can we explain that the rapid intelligent growth ability is also natural selection? However, this also does not explain the growth and acceleration of velocity. The rate at which the human body grows is constant, and time will be somewhat determined until a robust body is created. Those who have a speed beyond that may survive, but it does not explain the faster rate of intelligence growth after that.

In many ways, there are limitations that can only be explained by elimination. When society developed and the world could survive without the development of intelligence and body, the plateau of intelligence would have come, but we are acquiring more intelligence than that. In other words, after that, he grew up for reasons unrelated to survival. Such as her own curiosity or the needs of society. If so, were such devices also caused by natural selection?

Overcoming a need cannot perpetuate its function after the need is resolved. In that sense, human needs are peculiar in that they have no end. It could be resolved instantaneously, but after that, she wished for something bigger. Desire has characteristics that are not satisfied. So, the need for survival has developed into the need for reproduction, the need for reproduction into the need for sexuality, the need for sexuality into the need for social recognition.. This kind of chain of needs sometimes develops in a higher dimension, sometimes in a multidirectional direction, leading humans in another direction.

If so, how would the next chain of needs be created? It was something each of them made. Some develop the need for survival as a need for harmony, and others as a need for conquest. In other words, creative needs can be produced by thinking of the next step that each need needs to take. If so, how does each person’s original idea manifest itself?

It was possible because each of them built their own accident circuit. You may think that the environment you are placed in is different, but within the framework of language, the direction of logical thoughts converges. But the point is that this is not a convergence in the only direction. Verbal thoughts play a big role in which the next thought may not be the only one. Therefore, like syntaxic rules, we can only loosely confine our thoughts with the minimum rule, and we can continue countless other thoughts within it.